<p>Suppose an array of length <code>n</code> sorted in ascending order is <strong>rotated</strong> between <code>1</code> and <code>n</code> times. For example, the array <code>nums = [0,1,4,4,5,6,7]</code> might become:</p> <ul> <li><code>[4,5,6,7,0,1,4]</code> if it was rotated <code>4</code> times.</li> <li><code>[0,1,4,4,5,6,7]</code> if it was rotated <code>7</code> times.</li> </ul> <p>Notice that <strong>rotating</strong> an array <code>[a[0], a[1], a[2], ..., a[n-1]]</code> 1 time results in the array <code>[a[n-1], a[0], a[1], a[2], ..., a[n-2]]</code>.</p> <p>Given the sorted rotated array <code>nums</code> that may contain <strong>duplicates</strong>, return <em>the minimum element of this array</em>.</p> <p>You must decrease the overall operation steps as much as possible.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Example 1:</strong></p> <pre><strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,3,5] <strong>Output:</strong> 1 </pre><p><strong>Example 2:</strong></p> <pre><strong>Input:</strong> nums = [2,2,2,0,1] <strong>Output:</strong> 0 </pre> <p> </p> <p><strong>Constraints:</strong></p> <ul> <li><code>n == nums.length</code></li> <li><code>1 <= n <= 5000</code></li> <li><code>-5000 <= nums[i] <= 5000</code></li> <li><code>nums</code> is sorted and rotated between <code>1</code> and <code>n</code> times.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Follow up:</strong> This problem is similar to <a href="https://leetcode.com/problems/find-minimum-in-rotated-sorted-array/description/" target="_blank">Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array</a>, but <code>nums</code> may contain <strong>duplicates</strong>. Would this affect the runtime complexity? How and why?</p> <p> </p>