mirror of
				https://gitee.com/coder-xiaomo/leetcode-problemset
				synced 2025-11-04 11:43:12 +08:00 
			
		
		
		
	国外版
This commit is contained in:
		
							
								
								
									
										30
									
								
								算法题(国外版)/squares-of-a-sorted-array.html
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										30
									
								
								算法题(国外版)/squares-of-a-sorted-array.html
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
 | 
			
		||||
<p>Given an integer array <code>nums</code> sorted in <strong>non-decreasing</strong> order, return <em>an array of <strong>the squares of each number</strong> sorted in non-decreasing order</em>.</p>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<p> </p>
 | 
			
		||||
<p><strong>Example 1:</strong></p>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<pre>
 | 
			
		||||
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [-4,-1,0,3,10]
 | 
			
		||||
<strong>Output:</strong> [0,1,9,16,100]
 | 
			
		||||
<strong>Explanation:</strong> After squaring, the array becomes [16,1,0,9,100].
 | 
			
		||||
After sorting, it becomes [0,1,9,16,100].
 | 
			
		||||
</pre>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<p><strong>Example 2:</strong></p>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<pre>
 | 
			
		||||
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [-7,-3,2,3,11]
 | 
			
		||||
<strong>Output:</strong> [4,9,9,49,121]
 | 
			
		||||
</pre>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<p> </p>
 | 
			
		||||
<p><strong>Constraints:</strong></p>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<ul>
 | 
			
		||||
	<li><code><span>1 <= nums.length <= </span>10<sup>4</sup></code></li>
 | 
			
		||||
	<li><code>-10<sup>4</sup> <= nums[i] <= 10<sup>4</sup></code></li>
 | 
			
		||||
	<li><code>nums</code> is sorted in <strong>non-decreasing</strong> order.</li>
 | 
			
		||||
</ul>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<p> </p>
 | 
			
		||||
<strong>Follow up:</strong> Squaring each element and sorting the new array is very trivial, could you find an <code>O(n)</code> solution using a different approach?
 | 
			
		||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user